Last January, from Holland, Langdon Winner had this to say:

“I’ve gotten back into rock and roll, at least that part of it which shows up on Dutch, British, French or American Armed Forces stations. It's difficult for me to know which off he songs (other than soul group hits) are European and which are U.S. origin. Anybody can learn to sing like Mick dagger so I suspect that some of the big tunes here are Dutch rock and not heard back there. One thing is entirely evident, however, as this year begins, and it may have been evident to you for some time. The radio is filled to overflowing with songs which are super-self-consciously about the business of making rock and roll and living in its terms. Two which come to mind: ‘Rock and Roll Baby’ and ‘Rock and Roll I Gave You The Best Years of My Life. ’ I remember how precious a thing it used to be to hear any song make reference to its own medium. Now it seems to be the only thing going!

“But perhaps this period of heightened but ultimately ridiculous selfconsciousness is a prelude to what we’ve been waiting for — the appearance of something genuinely new. I don’t mean just music either. There are good signs that the whole atmosphere, political and cultural, in both the U.S. and the rest of the world is about to undergo a transformation. Too many things remain unsettled after having been settled, e.g., the ‘end’ of the Vietnam war, the full disclosure’ of Watergate and a host of submerged themes bequeathed to us by the last dozen years. There is a very great tension and it runs very deep. I don’t see how it can do anything other than create tremendous forces to push our center of gravity into one direction or another. Like tumblers in a lock falling into place when a key is inserted, there will be, I think, a convergence of new voices, styles, and interest headed in a particular direction. I don’t know, perhaps something like Dylan’s tour with the Band will be one sign. Maybe George Wallace will come out at halftime at the Super Bowl, throw off his crutches and lead a Bastille-type march and coup on Washington. The need is there. And I think, now, very very definitely, it is becoming a collective need. The tone of the time and the range of possibilities available to anybody at all are set by the coming together, often by coincidence, of a peculiarly matched set of human elements. There’s no counting on the logic any longer. But neither is there any denying that what is possible for us to do in any important way outside our personal lives does depend on a certain climate accompanied by a set of open doors which makes that climate visible. Unfortunately, I think that the working of these forces right now can only take the form of a Leader to personify what people are feeling. If it is proven that the Wallace assassination is connected to Watergate, we are in real trouble. Whatever the personification, we probably won’t like it. There is too much evil in the air. too much which Agnew and Nixon did not satisfy in the tormented American soul. But, as I am always heard to say, there may be some room to move in the cracks. The hard thing will be to avoid interpreting what’s truly new in terms of what’s old and familiar. It’s easy to get locked in. What’s interesting about the Dolls are some new bumps and crevasses — a strong sense of guilt, unfocused moral outrage, the missing sense of humor. It is, indeed, a lot like some very old stuff. But I get the feeling that for part of what we are about to see happening, the key may have gone about one ‘click’ in the lock. ”

I had read a lot of articles about Bob Dylan’s tour with the Band before it arrived at the Oakland Coliseum on -February 11, just before the close-out in L.A.; on paper, I knew all about it. I knew precisely how the show was structured (Dylan & Band, Band, D&B, Intermission, Band, D&lB, “Like a Rolling Stone,” Encore); with a few trivial variations, I knew what songs were to be played and in what order; I knew pretty much how the crowd would react and to what (they’d go wild for “Even the President of the United States must sometimes have to stand naked”; a few jerks would yell “We Want Dylan” while the Band played); I knew that well-timed lights would cue the audience response to “Like a Rolling Stone,” and that the song would be referred to as “an anthem” in the papers the next day; I knew that matches would be lit to solicit the encore. It

seemed like a set-up; I was looking forward to giving Bob Dylan a standing ovation when he walked out, but I was damned if I was going to light any matches.

What the articles did not prepare me for was the sound, the singing, the playing, arid the impact. I wasn’t prepared to hear “Rainy Day Women” come store-porching off the stage as a big, brawling Chicago Blues (the only music that compares to it is the version of “Leopard-Skin Pill Box-, Hat” from the Dylan-Hawks Albert Hall bootleg); for the black usher dancing down the steps of the Coliseum, waving his flashlight at the ceiling and singing, “Knock, knock, knocking on heaven’s door”; for the utter delight I felt when Robbie Robertson and Rick Danko rushed single mike on a chorus just like Paul and George in Hard Day’s Night. I wasn’t prepared for one bit of what mattered about the show, and I doubt if anyone else was either.

Never — not in 1965 when they were the Hawks (without Levon Helm), not at their memorable ’69 debut at Winterland or at half a dozen other concerts — hav^e ( heard the Band play with the fire Dylan got from them this time around. I have seen reports that barely mentioned their presence, let alone the music they made, but between sets, or the next day, the Band was what people wanted to talk about first. Robbie’s guitar playing was unmatched — he drove through two shows with a pointed frenzy most of his performances only hint at — but the difference was the beat.

And the word should be written louder than that: The difference, my friends, was THE BEAT.

It was a massive, intensely syncopated THUMP that at first overwhelmed everything else. Everyone knows Levon Helm is a great drummer but thjs time he played like a star. He was working right at the heart of rock ’n’ roll (often Richard Manuel joined him on a second set of drums, and while it was great to watch, musically I couldn’t tell the difference). It was the authority of his beat that let Dylan, Robbie, and Garth Hudson sing and play with a freedom that with any less of a foundation would have seemed merely personal; with Levon there it Was still personal. and also shared, sympathetic, dependent irt* on stage, and out in front of it.

The Band’s own sets were moving (especially “King Harvest” and Levon’s singing on “The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down,” though several songs were sluggish and Rick Danko’s singing has exchanged nuance for mannerism), but nothing the Band did on their own touched what they did with Dylan. Against the Band’s comradeship he presents a physical image of utter selfreliance (though he cannot get where he wants to go without them and his new songs are about the poverty of going it alone); against their careful intelligence he pits genius, erratic and eager for rules to break (the Band at their worst have never been as embarassing as Dylan at his worst, ‘arid at their best they write history where he makes it); against the Band’s pleasure in music (they smile, he frowns) and the satisfaction such pleasure gives us, Dylan sets a nervous fury, an impulse to drama, that can make you feel that the fate of the whole world depends on how his song comes out.

There is a side to the Band that is uncertain and a bit scared of the crowd, a side that takes refuge in a sort of rational craftsmanship. It’s an emotional limit that only Garth Hudson always escapes, and it may be the source of both the spare elegance of Robbie’s best lines and of the precise, even constricted arrangements the Band uses oh stage and on record. There is also a side that is wild, mad, and chaotic, and it comes out, in their music, only in snatches; an occasional guitar solo, Manuel’s drumming, Garth’s crazy piano on “The Weight,” on “Don’t Do It.”

But this is a side of the Band that Bob Dylan almost always breaks wide open. He takes the spotlight, and they are free to follow their hearts; they get a certain energy playing with him they do not get from each other; and anyway, they can’t handle his twisting vocals with neat arrangements. They have to set the beat, play for it and against it, even risk collapsing the song for the chance to touch the emotions of anyone who listens. They have to give Dylan the momentum he so obviously wants and play for themselves.

The music, then, was not neat, it was not orderly, it was not elegant. It was fierce: riding that beat, full of hard-won arrogance, love, and anger. At first the music hit in explosions, and then resolved itself into textures — Garth’s organ flowing delicately .over a solo from Robbie that was pure anarchy while Dylan’s wild howls cut across both. Then, when you thought you had a grip on the music, that you had heard what they had to say with it, they came back with something tougher — like “All Along the Watchtower.” y

"I felt more alive being in the same room with such strength.”

It had me riveted. It was a jagged, growling blast; the Band reached roughly for the melody and Dylan shouted past it. They made the recorded version — quite likely the best thing Dylan has done since Highway 61 Revisited — seem tentative and weak, as if, down there in Nashville in the late Sixites, Dylan had hedged his bet. In fact, six years later, he was raising the stakes.

As I write, I hear James & Carly singing, “Ride with the tide, Go with the flow,” and while I’m gratified the two of them are limiting their goals to their talents, such a credo strikes me as the very opposite of what Bob Dylan — or any artist — is all about. The music Dylan, made with the Band was not easy to relate to. If, in the past, you had only seen the Band (the group that sometimes spends more time on the soundcheck than they do playing), you might have written the edges off their music by assuming they were just a bit rusty after so much time off the road. As for Dylan’s singing, it was a shock no simole excuse (he’s tired, he’s rusty, he’s aloof) could contain. Some writers have spoken respectfully about Dylan’s experiments with “melisma” — that sounds classy, doesn’t it? — but melisma has to do with bending words, and Dylan was breaking them. He came down on the last word of every line with all he had, regardless of “meaning,” it seemed — like a gunfighter without a target, and Bob Dylan without a target is only shooting blanks. But he did have a target, several in fact: “music”; the songs; the audience; himself.

Music today — especially the polished, lifeless Elektra-Asylum folk rock that is aimed at the audience that came to hear Dylan — has a lot of welldefined, surface melody (in real rock ’n’ roll, the melody is inseparable from the rhythm and the beat); such music substitutes professionalism for inspiration. Dylan wailed out his songs, attacking melody as if it were an obstacle, not a means, to feeling; for professionalism he gave us a crude expressiveness, breaking through the limits of phrasing and technique. When he missed, he missed; when he scored, he drove his songs past themselves. Often he was aiming not his words, but himself (and not as “persona,” but as physical presence, as flesh

and blood) at the audience; instead of the messages and meanings of his songs there was something much more elemental; commitment and force.

If these shows were not to be merely a live greatest hits package, Dylan had to find a way to get an authentically new kind of life into the songs. This music doesn’t wear out any more than Robert Johnson, the Carter Family, or Little Richard, Dylan must feel, but proving it is* another matter; only by liberating the songs from his past and ours, yet without denying that past, could the songs continue to liberate the musicians and the audience. It had to feel right to the singer, and come across to the crowd.

Dylan was shouting, chanting, partly, I’m sure, to be heard over the noise, but if that was all he cared about, he certainly could have turned down the amps. The noise was part of the shout. To simply present the songs in a marginally new way — difference in phrasing here, change in emphasis there, transposed intros, altered tempos, they did all that — would, by itself, have seemed contrived, to the singer even more than to the audience. So in one sense, Dylan chose not to “sing” the songs at all. It seemed to me that more than anything else Dylan was reaching for an equivalent, though nothing like a copy, of his original sound; something very rough, disturbing, disorienting, not easy to like and capable of pushing a listener right through a lot of assumptions and expectations. It didn’t always work — it will take Dylan some time to master this attack. But the ambition was clear, and the songs that fit best with the hard chant — those with a beat strong enough to force Dylan to deal with the rhythm — grew as songs: “Ballad of a Thin Man,” “Highway 61,” and “Maggie’s Farm.” On the last two, Dylan was flatly the ultimate rock ’n’ roll singer; the Band was the final band. Any comparison between this combination and an earnest, talented group like the Allman Bros. Band — forget the lyrics —, would be a joke. This was rock ’n’ roll at its limits.

Other numbers were less songs than incidents in a struggle rock ’n’ roll — or the blues, or country music — embodies but hardly contains: staying alive, keeping the faith, building and fighting for a life where humor, anger, and love are not only the means, but the ends. What hit me, so many times, was the strength of this man; I felt more alive being in the same room with so much strength.

This -passed into the songs; they were stronger, as signs of life as well as comments on it. “He loves these songs as much as we do,” my wife Jenny said.

When Dylan first walked out on stage with Hudson, Danko, Robertson, Manuel & Helm, the applause died away even before they cut into “When You Go Your Way And I Go Mine” (“No bullshit,” that fast start said). The crowd (and who can say who was in the crowd? I saw professors I’d had when I was a sophomore in college, students I’d taught when they were sophomores) seemed caught between reverence and celebration, between worship and caution.

It was only when Dylan came out alone that genuflection and nostalgia took over the night. If the response to Dylan’s first electric numbers had been uncertain, the applause for the Band’s first familiar set loud and passionate, here the cheers dwarfed all that had come before and all that followed. Part of the crowd didn’t want to share their hero with those back-up musicians (not unless that was all they were, and it wasn’t); some people wanted to hear the words; a lot of people still hate rock ’n’ roll, especially the impolite version the Band was serving up. They wanted that old-time harmonica religion, and they cheered harmonica solos the way the rest of rock ’n’ roll America cheers drum solos. They wanted noble sentiments and enemies to hate; they wanted the ambiguity the last few years have enforced on life washed away, and Dylan, on his own, had such things to offer. Here he was submitting to the worst desires of his audience, and raising the most tired ghosts of his past. That’s all it seemed like — most of the acoustic numbers had none of the aggressive novelty, really a new sense of time, that was so striking in the electric sets. It’s not a matter of genre; “Wedding Song” sounds like Freewheelin’, but it doesn’t sound like a throwback.

Here was “The Times/They Are A-Changin,” even more lifeless and impersonal in 1974 than in 1964; “The Gates of Eden,” which was ridiculous in 1965 and still is; and “The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll.”

The title of that last song implies that the singer wants to reach out to a friendless woman, but the song is morally closed exactly where. “George Jackson” is morally open, and a true attempt at friendship. 1 think Dylan would recognize, today, that Hattie Carroll’s death was more important than Wm. Zanzinger’s six-month sentence — if his “personal” music of the last few years means anything, this would seem to be part of it. But while I thought how much better it would have been for him to sing “George Jackson,” and tried to understand why that song seems both more modest and more important than “Hattie Carroll,” I got a sense of why it would have been wrong for Dylan to sing “George Jackson.” It had to do, like so much of Dylan’s recent songs, with privacy. Jackson was a human being to Dylan — a man, not a principle — and while the record he made expressed that beautifully, there is a way in which singing the song in front of 16,000 people would have been a shameful invasion of the privacy even dead men deserve: a man’s right not to be made into a symbol. Hattie Carroll was, and she remains, a symbol, as if she was never alive. She didn’t die so Dylan could sing about her, and so we could applaud our rejection of the injustice of her killer?s punishment, but that’s all the song can do for her. Well, much of the crowd cheered and even stood up for morality, for justice, for better times, for when the world was black and white. It is said that Huey Newton and Bobby Seal founded Oakland’s Black Panther Party For Self-Defense after listening to “Mr. Tambourine Man” over and over* but this night, likely in the same town, only a few miles from the Coliseum, you could have found the Symbionese Liberation Army and Patricia Hearst — if you knew where, to look.

TURN TO PAGE 73

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 39

The songs that hit had new meanings, not quite as lyrics, but as events. With barely an exception they seemed to be aimed right at every member of the audience, to roll out and change us and then bounce back to change the wav we saw the singer on the stage. “You Go Your Way" was presented as Dylan’s declaration of independence, and we cheered it as such (again, it was exhilarating to hear someone make so strong a statement), but the performance had\ room for us too. “Ballad of a Thin Man” — well, I used to see Dylan sing that song, and I knew who Mr. Jones was: Everyone who wasn’t hip enough to buy a ticket to a Dylan concert, the folkies who booed, the others. This night I had no doubt at all that I was Mr. Jones, that the image did not have to stretch to take in those around me, that Dylan meant much of the rage and contempt of the song for himself. Here the new style made it home — Dylan screaming “MISTER JO—HONES!” and

flipping Jerry Lee Lewis, riffs off his piano — and if the song condemned anyone, it wasn’t those who didn’t know, but those who wouldn’t learn it. When he sang “Wedding Song” it seemed not merely a tribute to his wife (if that’s all it is, why bother to sing it to anyone else?), but a challenge to live with the kinds of extremes that must be communicated with words like “blood,” “sacrifice,” “knife,” and “kill.” Even within the context of Dylan’s private life, the song seemed less a victory to claim than a goal to reach for, and that mood was perhaps at the heart of the show: when I borrowed some binoculars and looked at Dylan’s face, it was clear that his work is not easy for him to do, and the intensity in his face was staggering. .

Since the concert (I woke up after eight hours at the Coliseum ready to go right back) it no longer makes much sense to me to see Dylan’s career in terms of progression; to look for a point of view refining or growing or slipping from year to year; to see a style at work in, and against, a changing world. All that is there, but somehow, it’s not very interesting. What sticks in my mind are a handful of songs — “All Along the Watchtower,” “Down the Highway,” “Bob Dylan’s Dream,” “Highway 61,” many more — and a feeling for how tough they are. For the moment, the rest slips away, j*ust as it did at the concerts (there were always songs I didn’t like; I don’t mind biding my time). There is much that does not and may never reach me on Planet Waves, but “Wedding Song,” for one, sounds more to me like the real ending of John Wesley Harding than anything else. If the question, “What does it all mean?” is worth asking about Dylan’s performance — it’s usually worth asking about anything — this might be part of it:

A man goes out into the world; he is bedeviled by its traps, seduced by its delights. If he is a fool he is determined not to remain one; he tries to read the signs God and the Devil have scatttered in the world, and he builds slowly toward a moral stance. He makes choices,suffers by them, and grows both stronger and more wary. He tries to get across what he has learned to the crowd, but finds they don’t listen too well; whether they do or not, he feels he has at least told the truth. Finally he returns home; he meets his wife, down there by the cove, and the two of them take off to have a drink, to make love, to get some rest. He’s worked hard, and he’s earned his reward. That to me is what John Wesley Harding is about, but there is one more tale to tell, the story Dylan has been working out since that time, and which he now seems to have focused in. one tune. “Wedding Song”

says that all the struggles of the world are present in the reward as well; the struggle only shifts to another plane. I think Dylan was trying to get across such a sense of struggle and reward on Planet Waves and that he didn’t quite make it, because he has been out of the world too long, and the songs remain too personal. One verse of “Wedding Song” seems to claim that a man must reject the world to keep faith with his private struggle (typically, Dylan sings the line, “But I love you more than all of that,” with such beauty he can make vou believe the world must be abandoned); along side of all the other love songs on Planet Waves, the last one can stay in that prison. But if the tune really does complete the story of John Wesley Harding, and if it’s heard that way, you might learn that the struggle in the world only deepens the struggle at home; that in some mysterious way* each struggle justifies the other.

Since making Planet Waves Dylan has been all over the country; he is back in the world. It is hard to believe the vital performances he gave are only a prelude to another effective retirement; it is impossible to believe that the vitality he must have received from the audience will not find its way into new songs as tough as those he shot off the stage. Elliot Murphy, who was there in the audience with the rest of us, tells a story that I think makes sense out of the stakes of Bob Dylan’s tour: “When I got together with Polydor, we went out to California to do an album with Leon Russell on piano, Jim Gordon on drums and Doctor John on organ. I was out there and it just wasn’t going right at all. One night I was eating dinner with my brother in a restaurant and really feeling down about the way the album would end up and thinking I wouldn’t know who I was. Suddenly my brother starts pointing across the table and his face is turning white. These booths were arranged so you were almost sitting back to back with people. I turned around and looked at what he was pointing at, and that second the guy in back of me turns around and I’m nose to nose with Bob Dylan. For some reason that gave me strength and I went into the studio and told • the producer to forget it. I came back to New York and we did it right.” Bob Dyl^n, like Mujrphy or the rest of us, needs other people from whom he can draw strength, who can inspire him and with whom he can struggle. This time, he went to us, and it should make a difference.

February 26, 1974